You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 8, August 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE SEVENTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NEW ENGLAND SOCIETY FOR VASCULAR SURGERY, DURHAM, NH, SEPT 25-26, 1980
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (32)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparison of Above-Knee and Below-Knee Anastomosis in Femoropopliteal Bypass Grafts

David C. Brewster, MD; Andre J. LaSalle, MD; R. Clement Darling, MD

Arch Surg. 1981;116(8):1013-1018.


Abstract

• Experience with 555 femoropopliteal reconstructions was reviewed to evaluate the optimal location of the distal anastomosis. Autogenous vein was employed in 347 (63%) grafts and various prosthetics in 208 (37%). Vein grafts demonstrated marked superiority in late patency (73% at five years) vs prosthetic grafts (35% at five years). Below-knee (BK) anastomosis resulted in slightly better long-term patency in the vein graft group. In contrast, above-knee (AK) anastomosis was clearly preferable when prosthetic grafts were employed, particularly in patients with poor runoff or limb-threatening ischemia. The incidence of major amputation was greater following failure of BK grafts, reflecting the fact that a greater proportion of such grafts were done for limb salvage. However, failure of BK grafts did not appear to alter the level of amputation as compared with failed AK grafts.

(Arch Surg 1981;116:1013-1018)



Author Affiliations

From the General Surgical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 9, 1981.

Read at the seventh annual meeting of the New England Society for Vascular Surgery, Durham, NH, Sept 25, 1980.

Reprint requests to 1 Hawthorne Pl, Boston, MA 02114 (Dr Brewster).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Dynamic Angiography in Below-Knee Bypass Grafts
Waneck et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1989;23:95-101.
ABSTRACT  

Femoropopliteal Reconstruction for Claudication: The Risk to Life and Limb
Kent et al.
Arch Surg 1988;123:1196-1198.
ABSTRACT  

The Alternative to the Saphenous Vein as an Arterial Graft
Limet
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1984;18:201-210.
ABSTRACT  

Femoropopliteal and Tibioperoneal Artery Reconstruction Using Human Umbilical Vein
Robison et al.
Arch Surg 1983;118:1039-1042.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.