You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 8, August 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE SEVENTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NEW ENGLAND SOCIETY FOR VASCULAR SURGERY, DURHAM, NH, SEPT 25-26, 1980
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Dacron vs Vein for Femoropopliteal Arterial Bypass

Should the Saphenous Vein Be Spared?

James J. Yashar, MD; Richard Thompson, MD; Ralph J. Burnard, MD; Albert K. Weyman, MD; John Yashar, MD; Robert W. Hopkins, MD

Arch Surg. 1981;116(8):1037-1040.


Abstract

• The increasing need for the saphenous vein to bypass lesions of the coronary and other small arteries prompts a reconsideration of its routine use for femoropopliteal bypass. Evaluation after five years in 124 consecutive patients (135 procedures) demonstrated no significant difference in overall definitive patency between venous grafts (63%) and Dacron prostheses (65%). Dacron prostheses were avoided when below-knee anastomoses were required, but when the distal anastomoses were made above the knee, the five-year patency for veins and Dacron was equal (67%). Although the quality of the distal runoff influenced the long-term patency, effects were similar for veins and for Dacron. The data support the use of Dacron prostheses for femoropopliteal bypass proximal to the knee joint, allowing preservation of the saphenous vein for possible use elsewhere.

(Arch Surg 1981;116:1037-1040)



Author Affiliations

From the Section of Surgery, Brown University, the Department of Surgery, The Miriam and Roger Williams General Hospitals, Providence; Memorial Hospital, Pawtucket; and Woonsocket Hospital, Woonsocket, RI.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 9, 1981.

Read at the seventh annual meeting of the New England Society for Vascular Surgery, Durham, NH, Sept 25, 1980.

Reprint requests to 1 Randall Square, Providence, RI 02904 (Dr James Yashar).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Choice of Material for Above-Knee Femoropopliteal Bypass: A 20-Year Experience
Berlakovich et al.
Arch Surg 1994;129:297-302.
ABSTRACT  

A New Assessment of Arteriographic Runoff for Predicting Fate of Femoropopliteal Arterial Reconstructions
Okadome et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1990;24:145-150.
ABSTRACT  

The Alternative to the Saphenous Vein as an Arterial Graft
Limet
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1984;18:201-210.
ABSTRACT  

Experience With Umbilical Vein for Femoropopliteal Reconstruction: Comparison With Other Materials
Jarrett and Hirsch
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1984;18:222-228.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.