You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 8, August 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Dacron vs vein for femoropopliteal arterial bypass. Should the saphenous vein be spared?

J. J. Yashar, R. Thompson, R. J. Burnard, A. K. Weyman, J. Yashar and R. W. Hopkins

The increasing need for the saphenous vein to bypass lesions of the coronary and other small arteries prompts a reconsideration of its routine use for femoropopliteal bypass. Evaluation after five years in 124 consecutive patients (135 procedures) demonstrated no significant difference in overall definitive patency between venous grafts (63%) and Dacron prostheses (65%). Dacron prostheses were avoided when below-knee anastomoses were required, but when the distal anastomoses were made above the knee, the five-year patency for veins and Dacron was equal (67%). Although the quality of the distal runoff influenced the long-term patency, effects were similar for veins and for Dacron. The data support the use of Dacron prostheses for femoropopliteal bypass proximal to the knee joint, allowing preservation of the saphenous vein for possible use elsewhere.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A New Assessment of Arteriographic Runoff for Predicting Fate of Femoropopliteal Arterial Reconstructions
Okadome et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1990;24:145-150.
ABSTRACT  

The Alternative to the Saphenous Vein as an Arterial Graft
Limet
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1984;18:201-210.
ABSTRACT  

Experience With Umbilical Vein for Femoropopliteal Reconstruction: Comparison With Other Materials
Jarrett and Hirsch
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1984;18:222-228.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.