You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 9, September 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Deep Veins of the Leg as Femoropopliteal Bypass Grafts

Martin L. Schulman, MD; Mohan Rao Badhey, MD

Arch Surg. 1981;116(9):1141-1145.


Abstract

• Deep leg veins were used as femoropopliteal grafts in 13 patients threatened with limb loss (average age, 77.5 years). Runoff was poor in ten patients, and three required transmetatarsal amputations. Early limb salvage was achieved in all cases. Nine (69%) of 13 grafts were either patent when last examined (four patients, 21.5 months average follow-up) or remained patent until the patient's death (five patients, 29 months average follow-up). Two of the late failures (six and seven months), occurred in the three patients who had secondary or complicated reconstructions. In the ten patients whose deep veins were used as primary grafts, eight have remained patent (average follow-up, 24.8 months) and two have become occluded (seven and 21 months). There was no operative mortality and minimal morbidity, suggesting that in patients threatened with limb loss and unavailable saphenous veins, the superficial femoral and popliteal veins may be the graft materials of choice.

(Arch Surg 1981;116:1141-1145)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY, the State University of New York, Stony Brook, and Deep Dale General Hospital, Little Neck, NY.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 9, 1981.

Reprint request to 29 Barstow Rd, Great Neck, NY 11021 (Dr Schulman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Superficial Femoral-Popliteal Vein Graft: A Reliable Conduit for Large-Caliber Arterial and Venous Reconstructions
Seidel et al.
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 2001;14:57-80.
ABSTRACT  

Subclavian Artery Bypass Using Superficial Femoral Vein. A Case Report
Simsir et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1997;31:601-604.
ABSTRACT  

Combined Hepatic and Vena Caval Resection With Autogenous Caval Graft Replacement
Miller et al.
Arch Surg 1991;126:106-108.
ABSTRACT  

Hemodynamic Predictors for Weaning Patients from Ventricular Assist Devices (VADs)
Termuhlen et al.
J Biomater Appl 1990;4:374-390.
ABSTRACT  

An 11-Year Experience With Deep Leg Veins as Femoropopliteal Bypass Grafts
Schulman et al.
Arch Surg 1986;121:1010-1015.
ABSTRACT  

Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty of Stenotic Deep Vein Arterial Bypass Grafts
Greenspan et al.
Arch Surg 1985;120:492-495.
ABSTRACT  

The Alternative to the Saphenous Vein as an Arterial Graft
Limet
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1984;18:201-210.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.