You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 9, September 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (39)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Audible Interpretation of Carotid Doppler Signals

An Improved Technique to Define Carotid Artery Disease

Robert W. Barnes, MD; Lee Nix; Stanley E. Rittgers, PhD

Arch Surg. 1981;116(9):1185-1189.


Abstract



• Direct interrogation of the common, internal, and external carotid arteries with a bidirectional Doppler detector was performed on 199 vessels in 101 patients. Audible interpretations of normal, disturbed (stenotic), or absent (occluded) flow signals were made by vascular technologists and the results were compared with independently assessed carotid arteriograms. The sensitivity in detecting severe (≥ 50%) stenosis or occlusion was 92%, with correct differentiation of these two conditions in 84% of vessels. Nonobstructive (< 50%) stenoses were detected in 30% of cases. The specificity in identifying normal carotid arteries was 91%. The predictive values of normal, abnormal, and absent flow signals were 95%, 90%, and 90%, respectively. Direct carotid Doppler signal analysis is more accurate than indirect periorbital Doppler screening in defining carotid stenosis or occlusion.

(Arch Surg 1981;116:1185-1189)



Author Affiliations



From the Noninvasive Peripheral Vascular Laboratories, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Virginia of Virginia Commonwealth University (Dr Barnes and Ms Nix); and the McGuire Veterans Administration Medical Center (Drs Barnes and Rittgers), Richmond, Va.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication March 9, 1981.

Reprint requests to Box 221, MCV Station, Richmond, VA 23298 (Dr Barnes).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Screening for Carotid Artery Stenosis with the Continuous Wave Doppler Listening Examination
Huber et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1997;31:571-576.
ABSTRACT  

When and How to Study the Carotid Arteries
Feussner and Matchar
ANN INTERN MED 1988;109:805-818.
ABSTRACT  

Combined Oculopneumoplethysmography and Duplex Scan: Use in the Noninvasive Cerebrovascular Laboratory Examination
Belkin et al.
Arch Surg 1985;120:809-811.
ABSTRACT  

Classification of Carotid Bifurcation Disease Using Quantitative Doppler Spectrum Analysis
Bandyk et al.
Arch Surg 1985;120:306-314.
ABSTRACT  

Noninvasive Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis Comparison of Direct and Indirect Techniques
van Baalen et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1984;18:88-95.
 

Neurologic Symptoms Associated With Nonobstructive Plaque at Carotid Bifurcation: Analysis by Real-Time B-Mode Ultrasonography
Weinberger and Robbins
Arch Neurol 1983;40:489-492.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.