You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 9, September 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Transcutaneous Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Monitoring

Use in Adult Surgical Patients in an Intensive Care Unit

E. Neil Schachter, MD; Terence D. Rafferty, MD; Carol Knight; Robert Yocher, MPh; Richard Mentelos; Leonard Giambalvo, MD; Leonard Firestone, MD; Paul G. Barash, MD

Arch Surg. 1981;116(9):1193-1196.


Abstract

• We evaluated a combined transcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide (tcPo2 and tcPco2) monitor in 33 adult surgical patients in an intensive care unit. Surgical procedures included cardiothoracic, general, vascular, and orthopedic operations. Ninety-three paired, transcutaneous values were compared with simultaneously determined arterial blood gas measurements. The correlation coefficient for Pao2 was.75 (P <.01) whereas for Paco2 it was .55 (P <.01). Although statistically significant, individual transcutaneous values differed by as much as 50 mm Hg from levels determined from arterial samples. Such differences make it inappropriate to use this monitor to predict actual Pao2 or Paco2. By contrast, continuous monitoring allowed observation of acute changes associated with respiratory-care procedures and cardiovascular decompensation. Such acute changes were appreciated on the tcPo2 tracing but not the tcPco2 tracing. We conclude that the tcPo2 monitor is a valuable trend indicator of cardiopulmonary dysfunction, but that the tcPco2 monitor is not.

(Arch Surg 1981;116;1193-1196)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Medicine (Dr Schachter) and Anesthesiology (Drs Rafferty, Giambalvo, Firestone, and Barash, Ms Knight, and Messrs Yocher and Mentelos), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 18, 1981.

Reprint requests to Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510 (Dr Schachter).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.