You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 2, February 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Delayed Wound Infection

An 11-Year Survey

John M. Davis, MD; Bruce Wolff, MD; Thomas F. Cunningham; Lewis Drusin, MD; Peter Dineen, MD

Arch Surg. 1982;117(2):113-117.


Abstract

• A small number of patients manifest wound infections several months to several years after their operations. A study was undertaken to delineate the clinical characteristics of patients whose infections became apparent after a prolonged time interval from surgery. Twenty-six patients were admitted to The New York Hospital-Cornell University Medical Center, with wound infections that occurred more than six months postoperatively. There were three distinct groups. The first group consisted of patients with Staphylococcus aureus infections related to superficial stitch abscesses. The second group comprised patients with pacemaker infections; S epidermidis was the most frequently recovered organism. The third group consisted of patients with more clinically significant infections. These infectious complications followed genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and biliary surgery. The findings of this study suggest that most of these infections are caused by organisms introduced into the wound at the time of surgery; these organisms may become active because of alterations in the host's resistance.

(Arch Surg 1982;117:113-117)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Davis, Wolff, and Dineen and Mr Cunningham) and Medicine (Dr Drusin), Cornell University Medical Center, New York.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Aug 21, 1981.

Read at the first annual meeting of the Surgical Infection Society, Chicago, April 25, 1981.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Cornell University Medical Center, Room F-2014, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10021 (Dr Davis).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effectiveness of a Surgical Wound Surveillance Program
Condon et al.
Arch Surg 1983;118:303-307.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.