You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 2, February 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (39)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Generalized Peritonitis

To Irrigate or Not to Irrigate the Abdominal Cavity

John L. Hunt, MD

Arch Surg. 1982;117(2):209-212.


Abstract

• The objectives of surgery for generalized peritonitis are to eliminate the source of continual bacterial contamination and to prevent septicemia and intra-abdominal abscess formation. A prospective randomized study of three different operative approaches of treating residual peritoneal contamination was undertaken: group 1, no peritoneal irrigation (14 patients); group 2, intraoperative peritoneal irrigation only (15 patients); group 3, both intraoperative and postoperative peritoneal irrigation (15 patients). The mortality in groups 1, 2, and 3 was 28.5%, 26.6%, and 33%, respectively. The overall incidence of septicemia and intra-abdominal abscesses in groups 1, 2, and 3 was 23%, 22%, and 17%, respectively. In those patients who survived, the incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses, wound infection, and septicemia was 6%, 23%, and 13%, respectively. In this series, there was no detectable difference in the mortality and infectious complications between the three treatment groups. The only clinical factors that adversely affected mortality and morbidity were peritonitis originating from the colon and age greater than 60 years. Early surgical intervention with removal of the source of peritonitis, debridement of all necrotic tissue, and drainage of abscesses remain the cornerstones of successful therapy in generalized peritonitis.

(Arch Surg 1982;117:209-212)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, Dallas.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 5, 1981.

Read at the first annual meeting of the Surgical Infection Society, Chicago, April 25, 1981.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75235 (Dr Hunt).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Chlorhexidine Lavage in the Treatment of Experimental Intra-abdominal Infection
Bondar et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:309-314.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Contribution of Escherichia coli Alpha-Hemolysin to Bacterial Virulence and to Intraperitoneal Alterations in Peritonitis
May et al.
Infect. Immun. 2000;68:176-183.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Treatment of Generalized Peritonitis by Closed Postoperative Peritoneal Lavage: A Critical Review of the Literature
Leiboff and Soroff
Arch Surg 1987;122:1005-1010.
ABSTRACT  

Scheduled Reoperations (Etappenlavage) for Diffuse Peritonitis
Teichmann et al.
Arch Surg 1986;121:147-152.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.