 |
 |

Surgical Decision MakingThe Reproducibility of Clinical Judgment
Ira M. Rutkow, MD, MPH, DrPH
Arch Surg. 1982;117(3):337-340.
Abstract
 |  |
A considerable portion of negative surgical second opinions may represent nothing more than reasonable interobserver variation (reliability) among clinicians. In a previous study, four fictional cases were developed for each of seven different disease processes. The appropriate case histories were mailed to a random sample of board-certified surgeons. They were asked to render a decision on the need for elective operative intervention. This report presents a two-year follow-up, in which all surgeons who responded to the original questionnaire were asked to reevaluate the same vignettes. By comparing an individual surgeon's set of responses, the presence of intraobserver variation (reproducibility) was noted. The results of this follow-up showed that a surgeon's judgment with regard to the same hypothetical elective clinical situation seems to differ over time. If both the reproducibility and reliability of clinical surgical judgment are as variable as these studies indicate, then the theoretical premise on which second-opinion programs are based would seem to be in need of reexamination.
(Arch Surg 1982;117:337-340)
Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Surgery and Health Services Administration, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore. Dr Rutkow is an Edwin L. Crosby Memorial Fellow of the Hospital Research and Educational Trust.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication May 12, 1981.
Read before the 14th meeting of the Association for Academic Surgery, Birmingham, Ala, Nov 6, 1980.
Reprint requests to Apt 71, 595 Northfield Ave, West Orange, NJ 07052 (Dr Rutkow).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Outcome After Surgery: An Evolving Concept
Kazmers
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1995;8:109-128.
The Challenge
Eddy
JAMA 1990;263:287-290.
ABSTRACT
Clinical Judgment : an Overview
Records and Weiss
Communication Disorders Quarterly 1990;13:153-165.
ABSTRACT
A Comparison of Decision Analysis and Second Opinions for Surgical Decisions
Clarke
Arch Surg 1985;120:844-847.
ABSTRACT
Surgical Decision Making and Operative Rates
Rutkow and Starfield
Arch Surg 1984;119:899-905.
ABSTRACT
|