You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 5, May 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Injury to popliteal vessels

R. C. Jaggers, D. V. Feliciano, K. L. Mattox, J. M. Graham and M. E. DeBakey

Between 1969 and 1981, 61 patients with 85 popliteal vascular injuries were seen. In the nine patients who required amputation, common risk factors included (1) extensive time delays (greater than 36 hours) between injury and repair, (2) associated bone and soft-tissue injuries leading to postoperative wound infection. amd (3) early occlusion of popliteal artery repair or delay in performance of fasciotomy. The low amputation rate in patients without operative delay or associated bone and soft-tissue injuries (2/54 = 3.7%) was attributed to the careful application of standard vascular surgery techniques in combination with early use of leg fasciotomy when indicated. Polytetrafluoroethylene grafts as substitute vascular conduits in the popliteal artery have an excellent patency rate and seem to be an acceptable prosthesis when segmental resection of the artery is necessary.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Critical Reappraisal of Indications for Fasciotomy After Extremity Vascular Trauma
Abouezzi et al.
Arch Surg 1998;133:547-551.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.