You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 1, January 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer as a result of normal mammograms

B. D. Mann, A. E. Giuliano, L. W. Bassett, M. S. Barber, W. Hallauer and D. L. Morton

Review of the effects of a normal mammogram on the treatment of 36 women with palpable breast carcinomas during a two-year period showed that 17 patients had biopsies performed within two months of their normal mammograms and 19 patients had biopsies delayed for three to 24 months. Of the 17 who had biopsies within one month of a normal mammogram, three (17.6%) had extension of disease to axillary nodes. Of 19 patients whose biopsy was delayed, cancer was found in axillary nodes of 11 (57.9%). Normal mammograms should not preclude biopsy of a breast mass.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Late-Stage Breast Cancer Among Women With Recent Negative Screening Mammography: Do Clinical Encounters Offer Opportunity for Earlier Detection?
Mouchawar et al.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005;2005:39-46.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Be Careful to Not Willingly Suspend Disbelief
Kopans
Radiology 2004;233:645-647.
FULL TEXT  

Invited Commentary Author's Response
Kotlyarov and Polan
RadioGraphics 2001;21:653-654.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.