You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 1, January 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF, JAN 23, 1982
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Extended Axillopopliteal-Axillotibial Bypass

Valuable Adjunct to Limb Revascularization

Jack H. M. Kwaan, MD; John E. Connolly, MD

Arch Surg. 1983;118(1):25-28.


Abstract

• Although axillofemoral bypass is now widely used, little has been reported of its more distal extension. Our experience in 12 patients with axillopopliteal (nine) and axillopolitealtibial (APT) (three) bypass form the basis of this report. Indications for these extended bypasses included suppurative groin infections and obliterated common and profunda femoris arteries. These procedures were rapidly performed in poor-risk and often critically ill patients. One patient died of recurrent aortoduodenal hemorrhage three weeks following successful APT bypass. The other 11 patients enjoyed patent grafts for periods ranging from six months to two years, although four of these patients successfully underwent a declotting procedure during this period. The early results of these extended APT grafts have been gratifying. This technique would seem to be especially promising for the management of limb ischemia or for rerouting in patients with infected aortic prosthesis.

(Arch Surg 1983;118:25-28)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, and the Long Beach (Calif) Veterans Administration Medical Center.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 9, 1982.

Read before the annual meeting of the Southern California Chapter of the American College of Surgeons, Newport Beach, Calif, Jan 22, 1982.

Reprint requests to Vascular Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Long Beach VA Medical Center, 5901 E Seventh St, Long Beach, CA 90822 (Dr Kwaan).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Axillary-Popliteal Artery Bypass Provides Successful Limb Salvage After Removal of Infected Aortofemoral Grafts
McCarthy et al.
Arch Surg 1992;127:974-978.
ABSTRACT  

Aortopopliteal Bypass: A Case Report
Sfeir and Hussein
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1990;24:350-352.
ABSTRACT  

Axillo-Femoral Bypass
Chang and Chan
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1986;20:27-35.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.