You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 12, December 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIF, JAN 14-16, 1983
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (28)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Prospective Analysis of Nosocomial Wound Infection After Mastectomy

J. David Beatty, MD; Gayle V. Robinson, RN; John A. Zaia, MD; John R. Benfield, MD; M. Margaret Kemeny, MD; Michael M. Meguid, MD, PhD; Daniel U. Riihimaki, MD; Jose J. Terz, MD; Mary E. Lemmelin, RN

Arch Surg. 1983;118(12):1421-1424.


Abstract

• We evaluated the postoperative course of all patients who had mastectomies from 1978 through 1982 at City of Hope National Medical Center (Duarte, Calif). The overall clean mastectomy wound infection rate was 24/294 (8.2%). The incidence of mastectomy wound infection varied with the method of biopsy and was 3.2% after needle aspiration and 9.5% after open biopsy. Mastectomy immediately after open biopsy ("one step") had an infection rate of 5.3%, whereas mastectomy at a subsequent procedure ("two step") had a rate of 12.4%. The maximal infection rate (23.0%) occurred following the two-step procedure when the interval was four to seven days. The infection rates for patients hospitalized three or more days before mastectomy were elevated, but no significant correlation was observed between the infection rate and other demographic factors. We recommend that needle aspiration biopsy be used prior to open biopsy to minimize the need for a two-step approach to mastectomy.

(Arch Surg 1983;118:1421-1424)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Surgery (Drs Beatty, Benfield, Kemeny, Meguid, Riihimaki, and Terz), the Infection Control Office (Mss Robinson and Lemmelin), and the Department of Infectious Diseases (Dr Zaia), City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, Calif.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 26, 1983.

Read before the Annual Meeting of the Southern California Chapter of the American College of Surgeons, Rancho Mirage, Calif, Jan 16, 1983.

Reprint requests to Department of General Oncologic Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010 (Dr Beatty).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Hospital-Associated Costs Due to Surgical Site Infection After Breast Surgery
Olsen et al.
Arch Surg 2008;143:53-60.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Multifocality in the Earliest Detectable Breast Carcinomas
Arbutina et al.
Arch Surg 1992;127:421-423.
ABSTRACT  

Continuous, 10-Year Wound Infection Surveillance: Results, Advantages, and Unanswered Questions
Olson and Lee
Arch Surg 1990;125:794-803.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.