You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 3, March 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE SECOND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SURGICAL INFECTION SOCIETY, BOSTON, APRIL 19-20, 1982-PART II
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Gentamicin and Tobramycin Penetration Into Burn Eschar

Pharmacokinetics and Microbiological Effects

Ronald E. Polk, PharmD; C. Glen Mayhall, MD; Janice Smith; Gaye Hall; Berry J. Kline, PhD; Erik Swensson, MD; Boyd W. Haynes, MD

Arch Surg. 1983;118(3):295-302.


Abstract

• This study was designed to determine whether intravenously administered gentamicin sulfate and tobramycin sulfate penetrate into the eschar of patients with severe burns. In addition, each antibiotic's pharmacokinetics in serum and the effect on eschar microbiology were determined. Twenty patients with suspected burn wound sepsis received either gentamicin or tobramycin. The microbiology of the baseline eschar was determined and repeated on days 2, 4, and 7. All patients had measurable aminoglycoside tissue concentrations, and elimination from serum was not unusually rapid. Thirteen patients had baseline eschar cultures positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Serratia marcescens; eight patients were initially bacteremic. Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were sensitive to both antibiotics and usually declined in concentration with time or were eliminated; the more drug-resistant isolates of S marcescens persisted or caused superinfection and bacteremia. Aminoglycoside antibiotics penetrate into burn eschar and appear to have a substantial effect on eschar microbiology.

(Arch Surg 1983;118:295-302)



Author Affiliations

From the School of Pharmacy (Drs Polk and Kline and Ms Smith) and the Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine (Dr Mayhall and Ms Hall), and the Division of General and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery (Drs Haynes and Swensson), School of Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept 20, 1982.

Read before the second annual meeting of the Surgical Infection Society, Boston, April 20, 1982.

Reprint requests to Box 581, MCV Station, Richmond, VA 23298 (Dr Polk).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Burn Wound Infections
Church et al.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006;19:403-434.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in burns patients
Weinbren
J Antimicrob Chemother 2001;47:720-720.
FULL TEXT  

Pharmacokinetics and burn eschar penetration of intravenous ciprofloxacin in patients with major thermal injuries
Varela et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2000;45:337-342.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pharmacokinetics of Cefepime in Patients with Thermal Burn Injury
Bonapace et al.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999;43:2848-2854.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.