This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (103)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Robert E. Condon, MD, MS; William J. Schulte, MD; Mark A. Malangoni, MD; Mary Jane Anderson-Teschendorf, RN

Arch Surg. 1983;118(3):303-307.

Abstract
• A five-year surgical wound surveillance program included the following features: (1) observations were made by a trained nurse-surveyor; (2) all surgical services, without exception, were surveyed; (3) the nurse-surveyor reported directly to the Chief, Surgical Service; (4) all infected wounds and all suspected of harboring an infection were observed daily by the nurse-surveyor; (5) all wounds were inspected on the third and seventh postoperative days, at hospital discharge, and at a follow-up clinic visit; and (6) cultures were obtained from all infected wounds. Data concerning infections for all surgical services were published each month at the mortality-morbidity conference. The number of wounds closed primarily and the number of infected wounds were recorded, together with calculations of wound infection rates by operation class, for each surgical service and for the whole hospital. During the study, the rate of wound infections progressively declined. The overall incidence decreased from 3.5% before the study began to less than 1% at its conclusion.

(Arch Surg 1983;118:303-307)

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin (Drs Condon and Malangoni) and the Surgical (Dr Schulte) and Research (Ms Anderson-Teschendorf) Services, Wood Veterans Administration Medical Center, Milwaukee.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Sept 17, 1982.

Read before the second annual meeting of the Surgical Infection Society, Boston, April 20, 1982.

Reprint requests to Room 1014, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8700 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (Dr Condon).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reduced risk of surgical site infections through surveillance in a network
Geubbels et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:127-133.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A study of telephone screening and direct observation of surgical wound infections after discharge from hospital
Reilly et al.
J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87-B:997-999.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of active monitoring of infection control practices on deep sternal infection after open-heart surgery
Borer et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001;72:515-520.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Severity of Illness Indicators in an Intensive Care Unit
Gross et al.
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:2201-2205.
ABSTRACT  

Retrospect and Prospect: Ruminations After the First Decade of the Surgical Infection Society
Condon
Arch Surg 1991;126:19-22.
ABSTRACT  

Continuous, 10-Year Wound Infection Surveillance: Results, Advantages, and Unanswered Questions
Olson and Lee
Arch Surg 1990;125:794-803.
ABSTRACT  

Nosocomial Abscess: Results of an Eight-Year Prospective Study of 32284 Operations
Olson and Allen
Arch Surg 1989;124:356-361.
ABSTRACT  

Does Infection Control Control Infection?
Condon et al.
Arch Surg 1988;123:250-256.
ABSTRACT  

Reducing Wound Infections: Gown and Drape Barriers
RUNNELLS
Arch Surg 1988;123:122-123.
ABSTRACT  

Reducing Wound Infections: Gown and Drape Barriers-Reply
MOYLAN et al.
Arch Surg 1988;123:123-124.
ABSTRACT  

Old Problems, New and Persistent Challenges: Presidential Address
Alexander
Arch Surg 1987;122:15-20.
ABSTRACT  

Decreasing the Incidence of Surgical Wound Infections: Validation of a Surveillance-Notification Program
Mead et al.
Arch Surg 1986;121:458-461.
ABSTRACT