You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 4, April 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE SIXTH ANNUAL SURGICAL SYMPOSIUM OF THE ASSOCIATION OF VETERANS ADMINISTRATION SURGEONS, ATLANTA, MAY 13-15, 1982
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Systematic Approach to the Assessment of Aortoiliac Disease

Brian L. Thiele, MD; Dennis F. Bandyk, MD; Robert E. Zierler, MD; D. Eugene Strandness, Jr, MD

Arch Surg. 1983;118(4):477-481.


Abstract

• The accurate localization of hemodynamically significant disease in the aortoiliac segment remains a major clinical dilemma that contributes to the less than optimal results reported for aortofemoral bypass grafting in patients with disabling lower limb claudication. We assessed the hemodynamic status of the aortoiliac segment with direct intraarterial pressure measurements obtained prior to arteriography. This served as a basis for determining the role of the femoral pulsatility index (FPI) in evaluating the hemodynamics of the aortoiliac segment. A stepwise decision making algorithm, developed from the results, enabled accurate identification of the location of the hemodynamic disturbance in 94% of the limbs studied. In 62% of the limbs, the FPI could be used, while in the remaining 38%, intra-arterial pressure measurements were used.

(Arch Surg 1983;118:477-481)



Author Affiliations

From the Peripheral Vascular Section (Dr Thiele) and Surgical Service (Drs Vandyk and Zierler), Veterans Administration Medical Center, and the Department of Surgery, University of Washington (Dr Strandness), Seattle.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 13, 1982.

Read before the Sixth Annual Surgical Symposium of the Association of Veterans Administration Surgeons, Atlanta, May 14, 1982.

Reprint requests to Surgical Service (112), Veterans Administration Medical Center, 4435 Beacon Ave S, Seattle, WA 98108 (Dr Thiele).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Development of Ultrasound Techniques for Assessment of Aortoiliac Obstructive Disease
de Smet et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1996;30:311-321.
ABSTRACT  

Laparoscopic Aortic Surgery
Chen et al.
SURG INNOV 1996;3:103-108.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluating Aortoiliac Disease: An Overview
Barnes
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1996;9:1-14.
 

Expert Commentary
Zierler
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1996;9:15-18.
 

Assessment of Aortoiliac Disease Using Hemodynamic Measures
Breslau et al.
Arch Surg 1985;120:1050-1052.
ABSTRACT  

Postoperative Surveillance: An Effective Means of Detecting Correctable Lesions That Threaten Graft Patency
Turnipseed and Acher
Arch Surg 1985;120:324-328.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.