You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 5, May 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 90TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, KANSAS CITY, MO, NOV 15-17, 1982-PART I
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Abdominal Abscess

A Surgical Strategy

Philip L. Glick, MD; Carlos A. Pellegrini, MD; Stephanie Stein, MD; Lawrence W. Way, MD

Arch Surg. 1983;118(5):646-650.


Abstract

• To reassess the role of laparotomy and extraserosal drainage in the treatment of patients with abdominal abscess, we analyzed the course of 79 patients who underwent 97 operations to treat 120 abdominal abscesses during a five-year period. In 66 clinical episodes the abscess was drained by the most direct approach. Sepsis resolved with a single operation in 80% of these patients, five patients (8%) required a second operation for drainage for an abscess, and eight patients (12%) died. In 31 clinical episodes, the abscess was drained by a laparotomy. Sepsis resolved with a single operation in 61% of these patients, seven patients (21%) had a second abscess, six patients (19%) required a second operation to drain a metachronous abscess, and six patients (19%) died. When the location or number of abscesses was diagnosed incorrectly, the success rate of therapy fell substantially. Since most abdominal abscesses can now be accurately diagnosed preoperatively, most abscesses should be drained by a direct approach. Exploratory laparotomy is indicated when preoperative localization is unsuccessful, when sepsis has not resolved after other methods of drainage, or when the patient has a concomitant abdominal condition that must be treated surgically.

(Arch Surg 1983;118:646-650)



Author Affiliations

From the Surgical Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center (Drs Pellegrini and Way), and the Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco (Drs Glick, Pellegrini, Stein, and Way).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 28, 1983.

Read before the 90th annual meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Kansas City, Mo, Nov 17, 1982.

Reprint requests to Surgical Service (112), Veterans Administration Medical Center, 4150 Clement St, San Francisco, CA 94121 (Dr Pellegrini).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Primary vs Secondary Iliopsoas Abscess: Presentation, Microbiology, and Treatment
Santaella et al.
Arch Surg 1995;130:1309-1313.
ABSTRACT  

Improved Treatment of Intra-abdominal Abscess: A Result of Improved Localization, Drainage, and Patient Care, Not Technique
Deveney et al.
Arch Surg 1988;123:1126-1130.
ABSTRACT  

Expanded Criteria for Percutaneous Abscess Drainage
Gerzof et al.
Arch Surg 1985;120:227-232.
ABSTRACT  

Laparotomy for Intra-abdominal Sepsis in Patients in an Intensive Care Unit
Sinanan et al.
Arch Surg 1984;119:652-658.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.