You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 6, June 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 90TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, KANSAS CITY, MO, NOV 15-17, 1982-PART II
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparison of Weight Loss After Gastric Exclusion and Partitioning

George W. Lechner, MD; Dan W. Elliott, MD

Arch Surg. 1983;118(6):685-692.


Abstract

• We report follow-up findings after two to almost four years on 100 patients who were described in a previously published prospective randomized series. Horizontally stapled gastric partition (gastroplasty) was compared with gastric exclusion (bypass) using a Roux-en-Y jejunal loop. An additional 142 patients had the identical operative procedures performed during the same time period, but chose their own operation. Both procedures used a small gastric pouch (15 mL) and calibrated 10-mm opening. Weight loss was better after exclusion and has continued to be better. Patients who lose weight well do not regain. There were complications in 8% of the exclusion patients and 12% of the partitioning patients and one death in the exclusion group—0.4% of the total group. Since gastric exclusion is safe and produces significantly better weight loss, we believe it sets the current standard against which all other bariatric surgery must be compared.

(Arch Surg 1983;118:685-692)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Wright State University School of Medicine (Drs Lechner and Elliott) and the Kettering Medical Center (Drs Lechner and Elliott), Dayton, Ohio, and the Sycamore Hospital, Miamisburg, Ohio (Dr Lechner).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 24, 1983.

Read before the 90th annual meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Kansas City, Mo, Nov 17, 1982.

Reprint requests to Sycamore Professional Office Bldg, 2130 Leiter Rd, Suite 210, Miamisburg, OH 45342 (Dr Lechner).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Meta-Analysis: Surgical Treatment of Obesity
Maggard et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:547-559.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis and Treatment of Obesity in Adults: An Applied Evidence-Based Review
Orzano and Scott
J Am Board Fam Med 2004;17:359-369.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gastric Surgery for Morbid Obesity: Complications and Long-term Weight Control
Yale
Arch Surg 1989;124:941-946.
ABSTRACT  

Gastric Restrictive Surgery for Morbid Obesity
Kral
JAMA 1985;254:2410-2411.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.