You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 6, June 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 90TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, KANSAS CITY, MO, NOV 15-17, 1982-PART II
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (115)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Straight Ileoanal Anastomosis v Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis After Colectomy and Mucosal Proctectomy

Brian M. Taylor, MD; Robert W. Beart, Jr, MD; Roger R. Dozois, MD; Keith A. Kelly, MD; Sidney F. Phillips, MD

Arch Surg. 1983;118(6):696-701.


Abstract

• The postoperative results of 50 patients who underwent straight ileoanal anastomosis after total colectomy and mucosal proctectomy were compared with those of 74 patients who underwent ileal pouch—anal anastomosis. No deaths occurred. Of the straight ileoanal anastomoses, 32% failed because of sepsis or diarrhea and necessitated abdominal ileostomy; only 1.3% failed in the pouch-anal group (P<.05). Stool frequency among patients followed up for three months or more (straight ileoanal, n = 30; pouch-anal, n = 33) was less in the pouch-anal group (mean ± SEM, 7±1 stools per 24 hours) than in the straight ileoanal group (11 ±1/24 hr, P<.01). Major nocturnal incontinence was also less in the pouch-anal group than in the straight ileoanal group (0% v 20%), and patient satisfaction was better, as measured on a scale of 1 (very poor functional result) to 10 (excellent result) (pouch-anal score, 9; straight ileoanal score, 6; P<.02). We concluded that ileal pouch—anal anastomosis resulted in less diarrhea, better continence, and an improved quality of life when compared with straight ileoanal anastomosis.

(Arch Surg 1983;118:696-701)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Taylor, Beart, Dozois and Kelly) and Internal Medicine (Dr Phillips), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 17, 1983.

Read before the 90th annual meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Kansas City, Mo, Nov 17, 1982.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 (Dr Dozois).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Ileoanal Reservoir for Ulcerative Colitis and Familial Polyposis
Schoetz et al.
Arch Surg 1986;121:404-409.
ABSTRACT  

Anal Sphincter Electromyography After Colectomy, Mucosal Rectectomy, and Ileoanal Anastomosis
Stryker et al.
Arch Surg 1985;120:713-716.
ABSTRACT  

Anal Sphincter Function After Colectomy, Mucosal Proctectomy, and Endorectal Ileoanal Pull-through
Becker
Arch Surg 1984;119:526-531.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.