You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 9, September 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Presidential Address
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Femoropopliteal Graft Failures

Clinical Consequences and Success of Secondary Reconstructions

David C. Brewster, MD; Andre J. LaSalle, MD; Jay G. Robison, MD; Earl C. Strayhorn, MD; R. Clement Darling, MD

Arch Surg. 1983;118(9):1043-1047.


Abstract

• We examined 188 failed femoropopliteal grafts during a 16-year period to evaluate the clinical consequences of graft failure and success of secondary revascularization procedures. In limbs with grafts placed for claudication, conditions of 9% with failed grafts remained improved despite graft occlusion, 67% returned to preoperative status, and 24% showed worsened ischemia. One third of claudicants with failed grafts underwent secondary procedures. Ultimately, only 7% of failed grafts in claudicants resulted in amputation, and overall risk of limb loss in patients undergoing operation for claudication alone was low (2%). After failure of grafts performed for limb-salvage indications, 21% of limbs were still improved, and 79% reverted to limb-threatened status, more than half of the limbs undergoing subsequent reoperation. Overall, secondary attempts at reconstruction appeared justified. Although the five-year patency rate of such grafts was only 31%, limb salvage was achieved in 52%, with relatively low morbidity and mortality.

(Arch Surg 1983;118:1043-1047)



Author Affiliations

From the General Surgical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 3, 1983.

Read before the ninth annual meeting of the New England Society for Vascular Surgery, Bretton Woods, NH, Oct 14, 1982.

Reprint requests to 1 Hawthorne Pl, Boston, MA 02114 (Dr Brewster).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Multidetector CT Angiography of Infrainguinal Arterial Bypass
Lopera et al.
RadioGraphics 2008;28:529-548.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Invited Commentary
Matalon
RadioGraphics 2008;28:549-549.
FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdominal Aortic): Executive Summary A Collaborative Report From the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation
Hirsch et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1239-1312.
FULL TEXT  

Postoperative Infrainguinal Bypass Graft Surveillance: State of the Art
Idu and Buth
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1997;31:115-121.
 

Automatic Postoperative Monitoring of Infrainguinal Bypass Procedures
Blebea et al.
Arch Surg 1997;132:286-291.
ABSTRACT  

Management of the Failed Primary Infrainguinal Reconstruction: Treatment Options and Long-Term Outcome
Akers and Hewitt
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1996;30:281-288.
ABSTRACT  

Should All In Situ Saphenous Vein Bypasses Undergo Permanent Duplex Surveillance?
Mohan et al.
Arch Surg 1995;130:483-488.
ABSTRACT  

Occluded Infrainguinal Vein Bypass Grafts. Are Secondary Alloplastic Procedures Worthwhile?
Fugger et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1991;25:274-280.
ABSTRACT  

A Comparative Study of Intraoperative Angioscopy and Completion Arteriography Following Femorodistal Bypass
Baxter et al.
Arch Surg 1990;125:997-1002.
ABSTRACT  

Technical Defects as a Cause of Early Graft Failure After Femorodistal Bypass
Stept et al.
Arch Surg 1987;122:599-604.
ABSTRACT  

Acute Arterial Thrombosis of the Lower Extremity: Its Natural History Contrasted With Arterial Embolism
Cambria and Abbott
Arch Surg 1984;119:784-787.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.