You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 9, September 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cholecystectomy Concomitant With Other Intra-abdominal Operations

Assessment of Risk

Paul J. Kovalcik, MD; Michael J. Burrell, MD; W. Levi Old, Jr, MD

Arch Surg. 1983;118(9):1059-1062.


Abstract

• In a retrospective study, 1,416 cholecystectomies performed during a three-year period were reviewed to define the risk of cholecystectomy when combined with another intra-abdominal procedure. Group 1, cholecystectomy alone (1,148 patients), with subsets of cholangiography and/or common bile duct exploration, had a complication rate of 14.29% and a mortality of 0.52%. Group 2, primary cholecystectomy combined with secondary intra-abdominal surgery (214 patients), had a complication rate of 19.63%. Group 3, primary intra-abdominal surgical procedure with incidental cholecystectomy (54 patients), had a complication rate of 20.37%. Mortality for groups 2 and 3 was 2.24%. The rate of nonfatal complications was increased slightly when a second surgical procedure was performed (14.29% {nu} 19.78%). Pairing cholecystectomy with other intra-abdominal surgery is advised only when surgical exposure is adequate, the patient's condition is satisfactory, and operating time is not prolonged greatly.

(Arch Surg 1983;118:1059-1062)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 7, 1983.

Reprint requests to Suite 406, DePaul Medical Building, Norfolk, VA 23505 (Dr Old).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Randomized Trial of the Usefulness of a Bile Leakage Test During Hepatic Resection
Ijichi et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:1395-1400.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Concomitant Cholecystectomy for Asymptomatic Cholelithiasis
Bragg and Thompson
Arch Surg 1989;124:460-462.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.