You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 10, October 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Peritoneovenous Shunts

Lessons Learned From an Eight-Year Experience With 70 Patients

J. Timothy Fulenwider, MD; Robert B. Smith, III, MD; Stephen C. Redd, MD; Joseph D. Ansley, MD; J. Michael Henderson, MB, ChB, FRCS; William F. Millikan, MD; John T. Galambos, MD; W. Dean Warren, MD

Arch Surg. 1984;119(10):1133-1137.


Abstract

• The peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) is preferred over other treatment modalities in the treatment of the cirrhotic patient who has intractable ascites. The favorable effects on nutrition, pulmonary, and renal function, in addition to prompt control of ascites, frequently overshadow potentially life-threatening complications. We summarized our experience with the PVS in 70 patients with portal hypertension at Emory University, Atlanta, and identified the perioperative complications and operative mortalities. Late complications of sepsis and variceal hemorrhage were frequent and often were fatal. Of the multiple preoperative clinical and laboratory determinants, only the serum bilirubin level (≥3 mg/dL) was predictive of the operative mortality and longevity of survivors. The PVS should be reserved for patients with disabling, truly refractory ascites.

(Arch Surg 1984;119:1133-1137)



Author Affiliations

From the Joseph B. Whitehead Department of Surgery (Drs Fulenwider, Smith, Ansley, Henderson, Millikan, and Warren), and the Departments of Medicine (Dr Redd) and Internal Medicine (Dr Galambos), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta. Dr Redd is now with The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 12, 1984.

Presented at the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Association of Veterans Administration Surgeons, Airlie, Va, May 27, 1983.

Reprint requests to Emory Clinic, 1365 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30322 (Dr Fulenwider).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Current management and novel therapeutic strategies for refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome
Suzuki and Stanley
QJM 2001;94:293-300.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Should Portosystemic Shunt Be Reconsidered in the Treatment of Intractable Ascites in Cirrhosis?
Franco et al.
Arch Surg 1988;123:987-991.
ABSTRACT  

LeVeen vs Denver Peritoneovenous Shunts for Intractable Ascites of Cirrhosis: A Randomized, Prospective Trial
Fulenwider et al.
Arch Surg 1986;121:351-355.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.