You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 11, November 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, SANTA BARBARA, CALIF, JAN 27-29, 1984
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (22)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Determinants of Failure in the Treatment of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Jo Carol Gordon Hiatt, MD; Wiley F. Barker, MD; Herbert I. Machleder, MD; J. Dennis Baker, MD; Ronald W. Busuttil, MD; Wesley S. Moore, MD

Arch Surg. 1984;119(11):1264-1268.


Abstract

• One must identify those fatal errors in the treatment of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) to improve future treatment and reduce mortality. Our vascular registry identified 29 patients with ruptured AAAs who died following admission to the UCLA Hospital, Los Angeles, and the Sepulveda (Calif) Veterans Administration Hospital between 1971 and 1981. Review of the records identified four categories of error that contributed to death. These included failure to proceed with elective aneurysmectomy in 12 patients with known AAAs, error in the diagnosis of aortic rupture that led to delay in getting nine patients to the operating room, intraoperative technical error that produced venous injury in eight patients, and undue delay in anesthetic induction in four patients. Following the outline of a careful treatment approach should further reduce the mortality in the treatment of patients with ruptured AAAs.

(Arch Surg 1984;119:1264-1268)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 2, 1984.

Read before the Annual Meeting of the Southern California Chapter of the American College of Surgeons, Santa Barbara, Calif, Jan 27, 1984.

Reprint requests to Section of Vascular Surgery, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, CA 90024 (Dr Moore).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Community Experience
Katz and Kohl
Arch Surg 1994;129:285-290.
ABSTRACT  

Antacid vs Sucralfate in Preventing Acute Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding in Abdominal Aortic Surgery: A Randomized Trial in 50 Patients
Borrero et al.
Arch Surg 1986;121:810-812.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.