You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 2, February 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE THIRD ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SURGICAL INFECTION SOCIETY, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLA, MAY 7-10, 1983-PART II
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparative Pulmonary Effects of Intraperitoneal Inoculation of Live v Dead Escherichia coli

Roderick A. Barke, MD; David L. Dunn, MD; Agustin P. Dalmasso, MD; John A. Johnson, MD, PhD; Richard Simmons, MD; Edward W. Humphrey, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1984;119(2):173-179.


Abstract

• We studied the effect of 2.5 x109 live Escherichia coli per kilogram v 2.7 x 109 dead E coli per kilogram injected into the peritoneal cavity of sheep with chronic pulmonary lymph fistulas. The effects of dead E coli were compared with those of live E coli, with respect to (1) pulmonary hypertension, (2) hemodynamic failure, (3) damage to the pulmonary microvasculature, (4) systemic arterial hypoxemia, (5) neutropenia and lymphopenia, (6) thrombocytopenia and platelet aggregation, (7) plasma fibrinogen concentration, and (8) classic- and alternative-pathway hemolytic complement. The time after injection of the bacteria was divided into an early period (zero to two hours) and a late period (two to seven hours). We made two conclusions: (1) The early period effects, with the exception of the absolute neutrophil count and Pao2, were independent of bacterial viability, whereas the late period effects were strongly dependent on bacterial viability. (2) The early notable difference between the live v dead groups, with respect to the absolute neutrophil count and Pao2, could not be explained on the basis of an increase in bacterial numbers alone.

(Arch Surg 1984;119:173-179)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Barke, Dunn, Johnson, Simmons, and Humphrey) and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (Dr Dalmasso), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, and the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Minneapolis (Drs Dalmasso and Humphrey).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept 16, 1983.

Read before the Third Annual Meeting of the Surgical Infection Society, Fort Lauderdale, Fla, May 10, 1983.

Reprint requests to University of Minnesota, Box 176, Mayo Memorial Building, 420 Delaware St, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (Dr Barke).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Association of Escherichia coli Virulence and Pulmonary Microvascular Damage
Barke et al.
Arch Surg 1989;124:449-452.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.