You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 3, March 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Effect of a Semiocclusive Dressing on the Microbial Population in Superficial Wounds

Patricia M. Mertz; William H. Eaglstein, MD

Arch Surg. 1984;119(3):287-289.


Abstract

• Superficial wounds in a Yorkshire pig were treated with a semiocclusive polyurethane film dressing (PUD) or left open. The number and types of microflora present in the wounds each day was determined by a scrub technique, selective media, and the spiral plating system. In wounds covered with the PUD, the number of organisms increased, and there were more gram-negative pathogens. We concluded that microorganisms in wound beds multiply and survive better beneath a semiocclusive dressing than with air exposure.

(Arch Surg 1984;119:287-289)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 15, 1983.

Reprint requests to University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, RC-513 Scaife Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 (Ms Mertz).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Occlusive Dressings: Does Dressing Type Influence the Growth of Common Bacterial Pathogens?
Marshall et al.
Arch Surg 1990;125:1136-1139.
ABSTRACT  

Occlusive Wound Dressings: Why, When, Which?
Falanga
Arch Dermatol 1988;124:872-877.
ABSTRACT  

Pyoderma Pathophysiology and Management
Leyden
Arch Dermatol 1988;124:753-755.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluation of Dressing Regimens for Prevention of Infection With Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: Gauze, a Transparent Polyurethane Dressing, and an lodophor-Transparent Dressing
Maki and Ringer
JAMA 1987;258:2396-2403.
ABSTRACT  

Accelerated Healing of Carbon Dioxide Laser Burns in Rats Treated With Composite Polyurethane Dressings
Chan et al.
Arch Dermatol 1987;123:1042-1045.
ABSTRACT  

Povidone-Iodine in Polyethylene Oxide Hydrogel Dressing: Effect on Multiplication of Staphylococcus aureus in Partial-Thickness Wounds
Mertz et al.
Arch Dermatol 1986;122:1133-1138.
ABSTRACT  

Semipermeable Occlusive Dressings: Effects on Growth of Pathogenic Bacteria and Reepithelialization of Superficial Wounds
Katz et al.
Arch Dermatol 1986;122:58-62.
ABSTRACT  

Inadequacies in a Wound Infection Study-Reply
MERTZ and EAGLSTEIN
Arch Surg 1984;119:1348-1348.
ABSTRACT  

Inadequacies in a Wound Infection Study
STRICKLAND
Arch Surg 1984;119:1347-1348.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.