You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 3, March 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  SPECIAL ARTICLE
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (98)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Characteristics and Uses of Biologic Dressings and Skin Substitutes

Basil A. Pruitt, Jr, MD; Norman S. Levine, MD

Arch Surg. 1984;119(3):312-322.


Abstract

• Biologic dressings used for temporary coverage of open wounds exert both mechanical and physiologic effects by protecting the wound, maintaining microbial control, and hastening wound maturation. Synthetic wound dressings modeled after the biologic dressings have been evaluated by several investigators. Those studies have shown unilaminate synthetic membranes to be ineffective when applied to full-thickness wounds and have identified a bilaminate construction as being necessary for membranes to serve as effective skin substitutes. The desirable properties of skin substitutes have been identified and incorporated in the design of recently developed membranes. Recent studies in this and other laboratories have resulted in the development of collagen-synthetic bilaminates, a totally synthetic biologically inert bilaminate, and tissue culture—derived membranes. The characteristics and limitations of each skin substitute determine the optimum usage of these composite membranes and define the modifications needed to improve the effectiveness of such dressings.

(Arch Surg 1984;119:312-322)



Author Affiliations

From the US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Tex (Dr Pruitt); and the Division of Plastic Surgery, Oklahoma University Health Science Center, Oklahoma City (Dr Levine).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 7, 1983.

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.

Reprint requests to Librarian, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Macroporous polymer foams by hydrocarbon templating
Shastri et al.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000;97:1970-1975.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Healing of Burn Wounds and Managing Infection
Shalaby and Shalaby
Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers 1997;12:330-341.
ABSTRACT  

Skin Replacements: The Biotechnological Quest for Optimal Wound Closure
Cairns et al.
Arch Surg 1993;128:1246-1252.
ABSTRACT  

Development of a Novel Hydrophilic, Biocompatible Adhesive
Mascarenhas et al.
Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers 1992;7:324-336.
ABSTRACT  

Review: Pathogenesis and Management of Pressure Ulcers
Tiernan and Lee
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1990;4:129-136.
ABSTRACT  

Sepsis and Survival in Burn Patients
Pruitt
J Intensive Care Med 1987;2:294-296.
 

Porous Collagen Sponge Wound Dressings: in vivo and in vitro Studies
Doillon
J Biomater Appl 1987;2:562-578.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.