You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 4, April 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE SEVENTH ANNUAL SURGICAL SYMPOSIUM OF THE ASSOCIATION OF VETERANS ADMINISTRATION SURGEONS, AIRLIE, VA, MAY 25-28, 1983
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Aggressive Surgical Therapy After Irradiation Failure in Treatment of Cancer of the Oral Tongue

Michael W. Mulholland, MD; Fernando Megallanes, MD; Barry H. J. Press, MD; Alan R. Shons, MD, PhD; Donald G. McQuarrie, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1984;119(4):394-399.


Abstract

• Fifty-three consecutive unrandomized patients with squamous cell cancer of the oral tongue were retrospectively studied to compare the results of an aggressive surgical approach performed as primary therapy or as salvage after irradiation failure. Twenty-five patients underwent surgery primarily, while 23 of 28 patients treated with curative irradiation required surgical salvage. Tumor staging was equivalent between the two groups. Local recurrences at the site of origin of the tumor within two years postoperatively were significantly more frequent in salvage patients (10.0%) than in primary surgical patients (5.5%). Cervical lymph node recurrences within five years were more frequent in the salvage surgery group (74.8% V 36.7%). Systemic metastases developed in a similar proportion in both groups. Determinate fiveyear survivals were nearly identical (55.2% v 55.5%). Although recurrence rates were significantly higher after irradiation and salvage surgery, an aggressive surgical effort in patients who are irradiation failures can result in five-year survival rates matching those of surgical patients.

(Arch Surg 1984;119:394-399)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Hospitals, Minneapolis, and the Minneapolis Veterans Administration Hospital.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 28, 1983.

Read before the Seventh Annual Surgical Symposium of the Association of Veterans Administration Surgeons, Airlie, Va, May 26, 1983.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery (112), VA Medical Center, 54th Street and 48th Avenue S, Minneapolis, MN 55417 (Dr McQuarrie).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Recent Experience With Reconstructive Surgery Following Major Glossectomy
Keyserlingk et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:331-338.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.