You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 4, April 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE SEVENTH ANNUAL SURGICAL SYMPOSIUM OF THE ASSOCIATION OF VETERANS ADMINISTRATION SURGEONS, AIRLIE, VA, MAY 25-28, 1983
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Guillotine Amputation in the Treatment of Nonsalvageable Lower-Extremity Infections

Kenneth E. McIntyre, Jr, MD; Susan A. Bailey, MD; James M. Malone, MD; Jerry Goldstone, MD

Arch Surg. 1984;119(4):450-453.


Abstract

• Primary definitive amputation performed in the presence of distal-extremity infection carries the risk of wound infection and additional limb loss. We reviewed 75 below-knee amputations performed for nonsalvageable foot infections. Patients were retrospectively divided into two groups: group 1 underwent open ankle guillotine amputation followed by definitive below-knee amputation, and group 2 underwent primary definitive below-knee amputation. In group 1, 97% of patients achieved primary healing after revision, and none required amputation at a higher level. In group 2, 78% of patients achieved primary healing, but 11% required revision of the amputation to the above-knee level. These data supported the following conclusion: guillotine ankle amputation followed by below-knee amputation for the nonsalvageable, infected lower extremity is associated with a significantly lower amputation failure rate than primary definitive amputation.

(Arch Surg 1984;119:450-453)



Author Affiliations

From the Surgical Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center, and the Department of Surgery, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 28, 1983.

Read before the Seventh Annual Surgical Symposium of the Association of Veterans Administration Surgeons, Airlie, Va, May 28, 1983.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular Surgery, Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ 85724 (Dr McIntyre).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Tibioperoneal (Outflow Lesion) Angioplasty Can Be Used as Primary Treatment in 235 Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: Five-Year Follow-Up
Dorros et al.
Circulation 2001;104:2057-2062.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Ampicillin/Sulbactam and Cefoxitin for Diabetic Foot Infections
Erstad and McIntyre
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1997;31:419-426.
ABSTRACT  

Assessment and Management of Foot Disease in Patients with Diabetes
Caputo et al.
NEJM 1994;331:854-860.
FULL TEXT  

Hip Disarticulation: An 11-Year Experience
Unruh et al.
Arch Surg 1990;125:791-793.
ABSTRACT  

Lower Extremity Amputation: Open Versus Closed
Senkowsky et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1990;41:221-227.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.