You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 5, May 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 91ST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, MONTEREY, CALIF, NOV 14-16, 1983-PART I
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (28)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Peritoneal Lavage

Reliability of RBC Count in Patients With Stab Wounds to the Chest

Erwin R. Thal, MD

Arch Surg. 1984;119(5):579-584.


Abstract

• Two hundred thirteen patients with stab wounds to the lower part of the chest and abdomen were reviewed to determine if a lavage RBC count of 100,000/cu mm was a reasonable figure to permit prompt recognition of injury and to minimize the number of negative operative procedures. There were four (1.9%) false-positive and nine (4.2%) false-negative lavages. Three patients (1.4%) had complications due to delayed operation, including one death (0.47%). Two patients (0.9%) had hollow viscus injuries; neither involved the colon. Three of the nine patients with injuries had cell counts of less than 1,000/cu mm. The negative celiotomy rate was 4.2%. It was concluded that the number of missed injuries, delayed operative procedures, and complications was sufficiently low enough to continue recommending 100,000 RBCs per cubic millimeter as a safe number to use as an indication for operation.

(Arch Surg 1984;119:579-584)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Southwestern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Dallas.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 16, 1984.

Read before the 91st annual meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Monterey, Calif, Nov 15, 1984.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75235 (Dr Thal).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Role of Laparoscopy in the Evaluation of Abdominal Trauma
Thal and Rossi
SURG INNOV 1996;3:178-184.
ABSTRACT  

Ultrasonography in the Management of Blunt Abdominal and Thoracic Trauma
Glaser et al.
Arch Surg 1994;129:743-747.
ABSTRACT  

Prediction of Injury Caused by Penetrating Wounds to the Abdomen, Flank, and Back
McCarthy et al.
Arch Surg 1991;126:962-966.
ABSTRACT  

Penetrating Abdominal Wounds: Rationale for Exploratory Laparotomy
Moore and Marx
JAMA 1985;253:2705-2708.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.