You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 7, July 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Lessons from initial experience with the in situ saphenous vein graft

M. C. Donaldson

A policy of preference for the in situ saphenous vein was adopted for all patients requiring bypass grafting below the knee. In an initial series of 25 operations, technical complications occurred in eight cases (32%), including venographic extravasation, vein injury during valve lysis, and early graft occlusions due to incomplete valve lysis and routing under tension past the hamstring tendons. Early loss of tibial outflow vessels occurred twice, with retrieval of embolic debris possibly shed from the graft. In spite of these events, at an average follow-up of ten months, 21 grafts were open (84% patency). Two occlusions occurred in patients who suffered operative complications, and another graft was lost after rethrombosis of a donor axillobifemoral prosthesis. Acceptable patency in spite of technical mishaps early in my experience encourages continued efforts to master the in situ method.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reversed vs. In Situ: Is Either the Technique of Choice for Lower Extremity Vein Bypass?
Taylor and Porter
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1988;1:35-55.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.