You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 7, July 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE TENTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NEW ENGLAND SOCIETY FOR VASCULAR SURGERY, BRETTON WOODS, NH, SEPT 29-30, 1983
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Isolated Popliteal Segment v Tibial Bypass

Comparison of Hemodynamic and Clinical Results

David C. Brewster, MD; Peter M. Charlesworth, MD; JoAnne E. Monahan, RN; William M. Abbott, MD; R. Clement Darling, MD

Arch Surg. 1984;119(7):775-779.


Abstract

• Clinical and hemodynamic results of isolated popliteal segment, tibial, and sequential bypass grafts were compared in a retrospective review. Results were good with vein grafts to either an isolated segment or infrapopliteal vessel, with five-year patency rates of 71% and 72%, respectively. Prosthetic grafts performed poorly in both groups, and sequential grafts appeared advantageous in such circumstances. Average ankle pressure increased 49 mm Hg following successful isolated segment grafts. Although less than with patent tibial or sequential grafts, improvement was sufficient to relieve rest pain in all instances and heal ischemic lesions or local amputations in all but four patients. If an adequate vein is available and a good tibial vessel exists, distal grafting may be elected, particularly if advanced ischemic lesions demand restoration of pulsatile flow to the foot. If such conditions are not present, isolated segment grafting will give highly satisfactory results.

(Arch Surg 1984;119:775-779)



Author Affiliations

From the General Surgical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital and the Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 15, 1984.

Read before the tenth annual meeting of the New England Society for Vascular Surgery, Bretton Woods, NH, Sept 30, 1983.

Reprint requests to 1 Hawthorne Pl, Boston, MA 02114 (Dr Brewster).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

MR Angiography in the Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease
Rofsky and Adelman
Radiology 2000;214:325-338.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Popliteal Angioplasty as an Adjunct to Above-the-Knee Synthetic Femoropopliteal Bypass: Comparison of Long-Term Results with Below-the-Knee Bypass
Onohara et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1999;33:151-155.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.