You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 7, July 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE TENTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NEW ENGLAND SOCIETY FOR VASCULAR SURGERY, BRETTON WOODS, NH, SEPT 29-30, 1983
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (29)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Postsurgical Changes in Arterial Compliance

Jonathan E. Hasson, MD; Joseph Megerman, PhD; William M. Abbott, MD

Arch Surg. 1984;119(7):788-791.


Abstract

• Mismatch in elasticity between artery and graft, a possible contributing factor to graft failure, has traditionally been believed to be caused by the graft. Compliance of the artery and/or graft may change after surgery, resulting in a different compliance mismatch. To study the arterial contribution to compliance mismatch, we measured compliance-pressure (CP) curves noninvasively in the femoral arteries of five dogs. One femoral artery was then simply exposed, and the incision was closed. Repeated CP curves were obtained after 24 hours, and after 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks. Compliance remained normal after 24 hours, but by one week compliance of the dissected arteries had dropped significantly at all pressures between 70 and 120 mm Hg. Compliance reached a minimum after two weeks and remained low until after four weeks. Postsurgical arterial stiffening causes a significant decrease of arterialgraft compliance mismatch and may suggest an upper limit for synthetic graft compliance.

arterial- Surg 1984;119:788-791)



Author Affiliations

From the Vascular Research Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 15, 1984.

Read before the tenth annual meeting of the New England Society for Vascular Surgery, Bretton Woods, NH, Sept 29, 1983.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114 (Dr Abbott).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Changes in Wall Mechanics After Endovascular Stenting in the Rabbit Aorta: Comparison of Three Stent Designs
Vernhet et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;176:803-807.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reduced Distensibility of the Common Carotid Artery in Patients Treated With Ergotamine
Barenbrock et al.
Hypertension 1996;28:115-119.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Absorbable Suture in Vascular Surgery
Storck et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1993;27:413-424.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.