You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 9, September 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  CLINICAL NOTES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (32)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

New Computed Tomographic Signs of Aortoenteric Fistula

John S. Kukora, MD; Fred W. Rushton, MD; Philip E. Cranston, MD

Arch Surg. 1984;119(9):1073-1075.


Abstract



• Successful preoperative diagnosis of aortoenteric fistula is often difficult. Clinical findings, roentgenography, angiography, and endoscopy have been used in diagnosis with only partial success. Newer techniques of gallium citrate Ga 67 scanning, ultrasonography, and computed tomographic (CT) scanning have been used in recent years to establish the diagnosis of aortic graft infection or aortoenteric fistula. In two cases, the CT scan clearly established the diagnosis of secondary aortoenteric fistula, as well as two previously unreported signs of aortoenteric fistula: intraluminal aortic gas and paraprosthetic extravasation of contrast medium.

(Arch Surg 1984;119:1073-1075)



Author Affiliations



From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Kukora and Rushton) and Radiology (Dr Cranston), University of Mississippi Medical Center; and the Veterans Administration Medical Center (Drs Kukora and Rushton) Jackson.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Jan 19, 1984.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, University Medical Center, 2500 N State St, Jackson, MS 39216 (Dr Kukora).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Primary Aortoenteric Fistula: Should Enhanced Computed Tomography be Considered in the Diagnostic Work-Up?
Wood et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2005;101:1157-1159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Paraprosthetic Extravasation of Enteric Contrast: A Rare and Direct Sign of Secondary Aortoenteric Fistula
Peirce et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005;184:S73-S74.
FULL TEXT  

Gastroaortic fistula as an early complication of esophagectomy
Molina-Navarro et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001;72:1783-1788.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Paraprosthetic Cecal Fistula: CT Demonstration A Case Report
Arrington et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1990;41:502-504.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.