You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 10, October 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (30)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Aneurysms of the Abdominal Aorta

Incidence in Blacks and Whites in North Carolina

George Johnson, Jr, MD; Andrea Avery, MD; E. Gary McDougal, MD; Steven J. Burnham, MD; Blair A. Keagy, MD

Arch Surg. 1985;120(10):1138-1140.


Abstract

• We examined race and sex relative to the unexpected finding of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) at 1,665 autopsies plus 545 abdominal computed tomographic scans in subjects over the age of 50 years. We compared our demographic data with those of North Carolina and our hospital to determine if the data base was representative. White males had a higher incidence (4.2%) of AAA than any other group of race and sex (1.2% to 1.6%) or combination of groups. Although whites (2.9%) had a higher incidence than blacks (1.5%) and males (3.4%) had a higher incidence than females (1.3%), this can be attributed to the influence of the white male. The demographic data of the group studied were similar to those of our institution's admissions and to the North Carolina population. We conclude that (1) there is an increased incidence of AAA in the white male compared with the white female, black male, and black female in North Carolina; (2) there is no difference in the incidence of AAA in the white female, black male, and black female; (3) race alone may not influence the incidence of AAA as there was no difference between white and black females. (Arch Surg 1985;120:1138-1140)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill. Dr Avery is now with the University of Louisville Affiliated Hospitals; Dr McDougal is now in private practice in Conover, NC.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 26, 1985.

Read at Student Research Day, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Jan 20, 1984.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (Dr Johnson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Increased Carotid Artery Stiffness Without Atherosclerotic Change in Patients With Aortic Dissection
Makita et al.
ANGIOLOGY 2006;57:478-486.
ABSTRACT  

Middle Age Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Older Age
Rodin et al.
Hypertension 2003;42:61-68.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patterns of Vascular Disease in Blacks and Whites
Maxwell et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1994;28:319-326.
ABSTRACT  

Physician Discretion and Racial Variation in the Use of Surgical Procedures
Mort et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:761-767.
ABSTRACT  

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms, Cholesterol Gallstones, and the "Einstein Sign"
Borrero and Queral
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1988;22:344-349.
ABSTRACT  

Aneurysms of the Abdominal Aorta
TILLEY et al.
Arch Surg 1987;122:118-119.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.