You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 11, November 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (33)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Femorofemoral Graft

Hemodynamic Improvement and Patency Rate

Andrew J. Lamerton, FRCS, MRCP; Andrew N. Nicolaides, MS, FRCS; Harold H. G. Eastcott, MS, FRCS

Arch Surg. 1985;120(11):1274-1278.


Abstract

• We measured the hemodynamic improvement after femorofemoral grafting and determined the five-year cumulative patency rate in 54 consecutive high-risk patients with unilateral iliac artery occlusion who had femorofemoral grafts who were studied with ankle and brachial systolic pressure measurements before and after operation and at six-month intervals. There were two early deaths and seven early graft failures (<30 days) with four amputations (all operated on for rest pain). All of the remaining 45 patients' conditions improved clinically and objectively. The resting pressure index (mean±SD) in claudicants (n=23) increased from 0.35±0.15 to 0.67±0.20; in patients with severe ischemia (n=31) it increased from 0.25±0.15 to 0.50±0.20. During the follow-up period (six months to ten years), there were eight deaths and 12 late graft failures (>30 days). The late cumulative patency rate was 60% at five years. Hemodynamic improvement parallels clinical success and for these high-risk patients, the femorofemoral bypass is a satisfactory alternative to a more major operation.

(Arch Surg 1985;120:1274-1278)



Author Affiliations

From the Irvine Vascular Laboratory (Dr Lamerton), Academic Surgical Unit (Professor Nicolaides), and Cardiovascular Unit (Dr Eastcott), St Mary's Hospital Medical School, London.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 9, 1985.

Presented at the Symposium on Extra-anatomic and Secondary Arterial Reconstruction, Charing Cross Hospital, London, September, 1982.

Reprint requests to "Trinity Lodge," 84 London Rd, Forest Hill, London SEZ3, England (Dr Lamerton).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Femorofemoral Bypass: An Analysis of 53 Femorofemoral Grafts
Maekawa et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1999;33:401-404.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.