You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 11, November 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Repair of growing vessels. Continuous absorbable or interrupted nonabsorbable suture?

R. M. Stillman and Z. Sophie

Twenty 1-month-old piglets were subjected to aortic transection and primary repair either with a posterior-running, anterior-interrupted nonabsorbable suture (group 1) or a circumferential continuous absorbable suture (group 2) technique. Mean piglet weight increased by 886% at six months and 1,184% at nine months. Aortic cross-sectional areas increased by 243% and 340%, respectively. Grossly visible, though minimal, stricture formation was noted in three pigs from group 1 and was associated with an overall 5.8% average anastomotic stricture at six months and 3.5% at nine months in group 1, compared with 0.2% and -0.1%, respectively, in group 2. Adhesion formation, fibrosis, and foreign-body reaction were common in group 1 but negligible in group 2. This corresponded to a mean wall thickness measured at nine months of 2.0 +/- 0.9 mm in group 1 and of 1.0 +/- 0.4 mm in group 2.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Absorbable Suture in Vascular Surgery
Storck et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1993;27:413-424.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.