You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 3, March 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE EIGHTH ANNUAL SURGICAL SYMPOSIUM OF THE ASSOCIATION OF VETERANS ADMINISTRATION SURGEONS, LOS ANGELES, MAY 9-12, 1984
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Reliability and Sensitivity of Frozen-Section Pancreatic Biopsy

Ralph P. Campanale, II, MD; Charles F. Frey, MD; L. Romero Farias, MD; Patrick L. Twomey, MD; James M. Guernsey, MD; Robert Keehn, MS; George Higgins, MD

Arch Surg. 1985;120(3):283-288.


Abstract

• A collaborative Veterans Administration and University of California, Davis Medical Center group of 586 patients with histologically proved pancreatic carcinoma was reviewed. During laparotomy, 159 patients underwent 251 frozen-section pancreatic biopsies with subsequent permanent section examination of the same tissue block. All 112 positive frozen-section diagnoses were corroborated on permanent sectioning. The 47 patients with false-negative biopsy specimens were equally divided between sampling and interpretation error. We conclude that in this group of 159 pancreatic cancer patients, 30% failed to be correctly diagnosed by intraoperative frozen-section biopsy. This failure was due to patient sampling and interpretation error in equal proportion. Interpretation error rates were not influenced by the type or number of biopsies. Patient sampling error is apparently reduced by repeated biopsy, and specimen sampling error occurred less frequently with wedge biopsy.

(Arch Surg 1985;120:283-288)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento (Drs Campanale and Frey), and Martinez (Calif) Veterans Administration Medical Center (Drs Twomey and Guernsey), the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC (Mr Keehn), and the Department of Surgical Education, Santa Barbara (Calif) Cottage Hospital, Santa Barbara County Health Care Services (Dr Higgins). Dr Farias is presently with the University of Maceio (Brazil).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Aug 29, 1984.

Read before the Eighth Annual Surgical Symposium of the Association of Veterans Administration Surgeons, Los Angeles, May 10, 1984.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, 4301 X St, Sacramento, CA 95817 (Dr Frey).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pancreatic Pathology: A Practical Review
Bellizzi and Frankel
Lab Med 2009;40:417-426.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.