You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 5, May 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 92ND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, COLORADO SPRINGS, COLO, NOV 12-14, 1984-PART I
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Pharyngoesophageal Dysfunctions

The Role of Cricopharyngeal Myotomy

Luigi Bonavina, MD; Nazir A. Khan, MD; Tom R. DeMeester, MD

Arch Surg. 1985;120(5):541-549.


Abstract

• Eighteen patients were evaluated for primary symptoms of cervical dysphagia and/or laryngeal aspiration and subsequently had a cricopharyngeal myotomy. Twelve patients had a neurologic lesion as the cause of the symptoms. Four patients had a Zenker's diverticulum as demonstrated by barium contrast roentgenograms. Two patients complained of persistent suprasternal dysphagia following one or more antireflux repairs for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophageal manometry identified a pharyngoesophageal motor disorder in all but four patients, two of the four with Zenker's diverticulum and the two who had an antireflux procedure. The results show that cricopharyngeal myotomy should be reserved for patients with an identifiable motor disorder confined to the pharyngeal phase of swallowing, ie, failure of the pharyngeal pump or cricopharyngeal incoordination and/or incomplete relaxation. Exceptions to this rule are as follows: (1) Zenker's diverticulum, in which an abnormality may not always be detected but of which the results of surgery demonstrate the effectiveness of this procedure; and (2) pharyngoesophageal complaints associated with reflux, most of which resolve with the restoration of distal esophageal sphincter competence. In those few patients in whom these conditions persist, a cricopharyngeal myotomy may be beneficial. Caution should be used in applying the procedure to individuals who have had multiple antireflux repairs.

(Arch Surg 1985;120:541-549)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Creighton University, Omaha.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 28, 1985.

Read before the 92nd annual meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Colorado Springs, Colo, Nov 12, 1984.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Creighton University, 601 N 30th St, Omaha, NE 68131 (Dr DeMeester).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

RESULTS OF REOPERATION ON THE UPPER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER
Rocco et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1999;117:28-31.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

CRICOPHARYNGEAL MYOTOMY FOR NEUROGENIC OROPHARYNGEAL DYSPHAGIA
Poirier et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1997;113:233-241.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.