You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 7, July 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 11TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NEW ENGLAND SOCIETY FOR VASCULAR SURGERY, DIXVILLE NOTCH, NH, OCT 11-12, 1984
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Combined Oculopneumoplethysmography and Duplex Scan

Use in the Noninvasive Cerebrovascular Laboratory Examination

Michael Belkin, MD; Charles A. Bucknam, MD; Janice E. Giuca, RN, RVT; Leslie M. Horowitz, RN, RVT

Arch Surg. 1985;120(7):809-811.


Abstract

• To determine the relative merits of oculopneumoplethysmography (OPG) (Gee) and duplex scanning of the carotid arteries, a retrospective analysis was made of 93 patients in a 12-month period who underwent noninvasive carotid studies followed by carotid angiography. The results for the duplex scan were 91% sensitivity, 86% specificity, and 89% overall accuracy in evaluation of 184 arteries. The OPG results were 59% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and 74% accuracy when applied to individual arteries. The sensitivity of OPG increased to 77% when applied to disease in the patient rather than in individual arteries. Analysis of cases in which the duplex scan and OPG were in agreement and disagreement suggested an important role for the OPG test despite its inferior accuracy compared with the duplex scan alone. The predictive value of an abnormal duplex scan result was 98% when the OPG was also abnormal, whereas it was 81% when the OPG was normal. The predictive value of a normal duplex scan result was 93% when the OPG was also normal, whereas it was 60% in those cases where the OPG was abnormal. We believe that the duplex scan should be the basic noninvasive evaluation of cerebrovascular disease, although the OPG continues to provide important information.

(Arch Surg 1985;120:809-811)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Hartford (Conn) Hospital.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 15, 1985.

Read before the 11th annual meeting of the New England Society for Vascular Surgery, Dixville Notch, NH, Oct 12, 1984.

Reprint requests to 100 Retreat Ave, Hartford, CT 06106 (Dr Bucknam).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Duplex Ultrasound and Ocular Pneumoplethysmography Concordance in Detecting Severe Carotid Stenosis
Castaldo et al.
Arch Neurol 1989;46:518-522.
ABSTRACT  

Recent Experience With the Asymptomatic Cervical Bruit
Donaldson et al.
Arch Surg 1987;122:893-896.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.