You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 7, July 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

In situ femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal bypass. Two-year experience

W. I. Carney Jr, A. Balko and M. S. Barrett

We describe 83 in situ femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal artery bypass grafts. The in situ technique involved the valve incision method using scissors, the valvulotome (Leather), and a modified valve cutter (Hall). Arteriovenous fistulae were detected intraoperatively by angiography and/or the Doppler method and ligated. The operative indications were rest pain, ulcer, and gangrene in 88% of cases, and claudication in 7.2%. The mean preoperative ankle pressure was 61.3 mm Hg and the ankle-brachial index was 0.43. The mean postoperative ankle pressure was 125.3 mm Hg and the ankle-brachial index was 0.97. The vein utilization rate was 96%. One-year patency for popliteal anastomoses was 85.7%, for peroneal anastomoses it was 100%, and for infrapopliteal anastomoses it was 89.6%. The data suggest that the practicing vascular surgeon can adopt the in situ technique and can expect high graft patency rates even in limb salvage situations with poor distal outflow.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Video-Assisted Vein Harvest: A Single Institution's Experience of 103 Peripheral Bypass Cases
Voellinger and Jordan
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1998;32:545-557.
ABSTRACT  

Surgery or Endovascular Surgery for Chronic Lower Extremity Ischemia: What Selection Criteria Should We Use?
Colburn and Moore
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1995;8:31-55.
 

Reversed vs. In Situ: Is Either the Technique of Choice for Lower Extremity Vein Bypass?
Taylor and Porter
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1988;1:35-55.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.