You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 7, July 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 11TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NEW ENGLAND SOCIETY FOR VASCULAR SURGERY, DIXVILLE NOTCH, NH, OCT 11-12, 1984
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Results of Aortic Grafting in Occlusive vs Aneurysmal Disease

Bauer E. Sumpio, MD, PhD; Diana N. Traquina, MD; Richard J. Gusberg, MD

Arch Surg. 1985;120(7):817-819.


Abstract

• Recent demographic and biochemical studies have suggested that there may be significant differences in the population of patients undergoing reconstruction for an aortic aneurysm (AA) or atherosclerotic occlusive disease (OCC) of the abdominal aorta. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the results of aortic surgery in these different patient groups. One hundred three patients undergoing aortic grafting were reviewed. Twenty-four patients underwent reconstruction for OCC, 65 electively for asymptomatic aneurysms (EAA), and 14 for ruptured aortic aneurysms (RAA). The mean age for OCC patients (54 years) was significantly lower than that for EAA (68 years) or RAA patients (71 years). Patients with AA were predominantly male (92%) compared with those with OCC (62%). Despite the age and sex differences, there were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of cardiac disease, hypertension, smoking history, diabetes mellitus, or renal or pulmonary disease. In addition, there were no significant intraoperative differences in terms of operative and clamp times, fluid administration, urine output, hypotension, or subsequent postoperative morbidity and mortality. We conclude that despite AA and OCC patients being demographically distinct, there is essentially no difference in elective aortic bifurcation graft surgery between these two populations.

(Arch Surg 1985;120:817-819)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 9, 1985.

Read before the 11th annual meeting of the New England Society for Vascular Surgery, Dixville Notch, NH, Oct 11, 1984.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510 (Dr Gusberg).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.