You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 7, July 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Intraoperative serum and tissue activity of cefazolin and cefoxitin

J. T. DiPiro, J. J. Vallner, T. A. Bowden Jr, B. A. Clark and J. F. Sisley

We determined the intraoperative serum and wound-muscle concentrations of cefazolin and cefoxitin in 40 patients who were undergoing cholecystectomies. The study employed an open-label design in which all of the patients randomly received cefazolin sodium (20 mg/kg) or cefoxitin sodium (30 mg/kg) intravenously while the patient was in the ward ("on call") or with the induction of anesthesia. Multiple blood and wound-muscle samples were collected intraoperatively and assayed for their cephalosporin concentrations. Considerable differences in intraoperative serum and tissue concentrations between antibiotics were apparent; there were usually higher levels of cefazolin. In all of the patients who received cefazolin sodium, the antimicrobial was detectable in wound tissue at wound closure, while it was detectable in 86% and 38% of patients who received cefoxitin sodium with anesthesia and on call, respectively. Because cefoxitin has a much shorter elimination half-life than cefazolin it seems prudent to administer the agent as close to the start of the operation as possible, and readminister the agent every two to three hours until the wound is closed. For cefazolin, on-call administration appears to be acceptable, with readministration not required for at least four hours.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinical and economic outcomes of pharmacist-managed antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical patients
Bond and Raehl
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:1935-1942.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Practice Guideline Series: Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Cardiac Surgery, Part II: Antibiotic Choice
Engelman et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007;83:1569-1576.
FULL TEXT  

Use of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Major Surgery: Baseline Results From the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project
Bratzler et al.
Arch Surg 2005;140:174-182.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Serum levels of prophylactic cefazolin during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery
Fellinger et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2002;74:1187-1190.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.