This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (5)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

John R. Clarke, MD

Arch Surg. 1985;120(7):844-847.

Abstract
• Second opinions and decision analysis, a mathematical process the decision maker can use to represent and solve problems, were compared in hypothetical surgical situations. Fifty expert surgeons gave opinions and provided the information necessary to solve the problems by decision analyses. Each surgeon's opinion was randomly selected again as a second opinion. In six difficult cases, 59% of the individual opinions were correct when compared with previously determined answers. For two surgical second-opinion protocols, the accuracies were 54% and 60%. The accuracy of the decision analyses was 69%. Improvement from second-opinion protocols can be predicted mathematically and is limited. Improvement from decision analysis is not limited by mathematical constraints. Decision analysis may be preferable to second opinions in verifying surgical decisions.

(Arch Surg 1985;120:844-847)

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Surgery, The Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Dec 11, 1984.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, The Medical College of Pennsylvania, 3300 Henry Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19129 (Dr Clarke).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?