You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 9, September 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Emergency Intravenous Pyelography in the Trauma Patient

A Reexamination of the Indications

John B. Fortune, MD; Johan Brahme, MD; Michael Mulligan; Thomas L. Wachtel, MD

Arch Surg. 1985;120(9):1056-1059.


Abstract

• Because of the high incidence of abnormal intravenous pyelograms (IVPs) in victims of blunt trauma undergoing resuscitation, a retrospective review of the Trauma Registry at the University of California, San Diego Medical Center, was undertaken to evaluate the indications for ordering this test. The charts of 216 patients were reviewed, all of whom had formal IVPs (four films) done as an emergency procedure at the time of admission. In this study, special attention was directed toward comparing both the degree of hematuria and the anatomic site of injury with the results of the IVP. A total of 20 renal injuries was detected by IVP. Of these injuries, all but one had hematuria that was greater than 50 red blood cells per high-power field. All but one of the abnormal IVPs were associated with obvious abdominal injuries. The results of the IVP influenced the clinical course of only one patient in the entire series. We conclude that the use of the formal IVP (four films) in the resuscitation phase of treating the multiply traumatized patient be reserved for those patients with penetrating abdominal injury or with hematuria consisting of greater than 50 red blood cells per high-power field. For any major blunt abdominal trauma without significant hematuria, a more simple and rapid study (one-shot IVP) to demonstrate bilateral nephrograms is probably adequate to rule out occult renal artery thrombosis.

(Arch Surg 1985;120:1056-1059)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Trauma, University of California School of Medicine, San Diego (Drs Brahme and Wachtel and Mr Mulligan) and the Department of Surgery, Albany (NY) Medical College (Dr Fortune). Dr Wachtel is now with Good Samaritan Hospital, Phoenix.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 20, 1985.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Ave, Albany, NY 12208 (Dr Fortune).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Investigating microscopic haematuria in blunt abdominal trauma
Saunders and Argall
Emerg. Med. J. 2002;19:322-323.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hematuria Following Blunt Abdominal Trauma: The Utility of Intravenous Pyelography
Klein et al.
Arch Surg 1988;123:1173-1177.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.