You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 10, October 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, PALM SPRINGS, CALIF, JAN 17-19, 1986
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Changes in the Treatment of Rectal Carcinoma and Effects on Local Recurrence

Mark W. Odou, MD; Theodore X. O'Connell, MD

Arch Surg. 1986;121(10):1114-1116.


Abstract

• We divided 563 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma located between 5 and 15 cm from the anal verge, who underwent curative resections, into two groups. The first had surgery from 1973 to 1978, before the introduction of the intraluminal stapling device (ISD), whereas the second group consisted of patients operated on between 1979 and 1983, when the stapler was commonly used. The number of low anterior resections (LARs) dramatically increased from 46% (113/248) during the first period to 62% (196/315) during the second. The major contribution to this increase occurred in tumors of the midrectum (5 to 10 cm), where a threefold rise in LARs was seen. Despite this increase in LARs, local recurrence overall was not significantly affected. Among patients undergoing LARs for midrectal lesions, local recurrence actually decreased from 34% (10/29) to 17% (16/95). This improvement may be secondary to greater distal margins of resection afforded by the ISD. The ISD has allowed more LARs, thus preserving normal bowel function and quality of life without compromising treatment goals.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:1114-1116)



Author Affiliations

From Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Los Angeles.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Aug 7, 1986.

Read before the Annual Meeting of the Southern California Chapter of the American College of Surgeons, Palm Springs, Calif, Jan 17, 1986.

Reprint requests to Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, 1526 N Edgemont Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90027 (Dr O'Connell).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Treatment of Rectal Carcinoma
SEYDEL
Arch Surg 1988;123:122-122.
ABSTRACT  

Correction: Duke to Dukes
SARMA
Arch Surg 1987;122:1088-1088.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.