You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 10, October 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, PALM SPRINGS, CALIF, JAN 17-19, 1986
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Suture Technique in Preventing Dehiscence of Prosthetic Mitral Valves

Geoffrey M. Stiles, MD; Jules A. Kernen, MD; Quentin R. Stiles, MD

Arch Surg. 1986;121(10):1136-1140.


Abstract

• To evaluate suture techniques for mitral valve replacement, 60 fresh porcine hearts were used to determine suture holding strength. Using four techniques (simple interrupted, figure-of-eight, and horizontal without and with pledgets), the anterior leaflet, the posterior leaflet, and the commissures were sutured. The free ends of the sutures were then attached to a force transducer, and tension was increased until disruption occurred. In the anterior leaflet, horizontal mattress sutures disrupted with significantly less force than the other techniques. Pledgets increased the holding strength of mattress sutures, but figure-of-eight and simple interrupted sutures had greater holding strength than sutures with pledgets, suggesting that the direction of the suture vs that of tissue fibers is critical. Histologic studies confirmed this point. The posterior leaflet exhibited less holding strength than the anterior leaflet for all suture techniques but did not demonstrate a superiority for any specific technique. The posterior leaflet is the problem area for suture disruption from the mitral anulus. We secure mitral prostheses with horizontal mattress sutures with pledgets around the entire anulus, placing them from the atrial side.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:1136-1140)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Los Angeles County—University of Southern California Medical Center (Drs G. M. Stiles and Q. R. Stiles); and the Department of Pathology, Hospital of the Good Samaritan, Los Angeles (Dr Kernen).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 29, 1986.

Read before the Annual Meeting of the Southern California Chapter of the American College of Surgeons, Palm Springs, Calif, Jan 17, 1986.

Reprint requests to 1245 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90017 (Dr Q. R. Stiles).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.