You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 10, October 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Aortic Reconstruction for Occlusive Disease

Comparable Results in Diabetics

Frederick F. Bartlett, MD; Gary W. Gibbons, MD; Frank C. Wheelock, Jr, MD

Arch Surg. 1986;121(10):1150-1153.


Abstract

• The case reports of 100 consecutive patients receiving aortic bifurcation grafts strictly for occlusive disease were reviewed. Fifty-seven diabetics and 43 nondiabetics constituted the study group. Mean age and preoperative risk factors were otherwise comparable. Sixty-eight percent of operations in diabetics were for limb salvage as compared with 47% in the nondiabetic group. All 100 patients survived the operation and left the hospital with open grafts. The complication rate was similar in both groups. Mean follow-up was 48 months in the diabetic group vs 58 months in the nondiabetic group. Thirty-three percent of the diabetics were dead at four years, a survival rate one half of that of the nondiabetics. Nine percent of patients in each group suffered late limb graft occlusions, a cumulative graft patency of 94% at five years. Limb loss and subsequent distal reconstruction were comparatively low although higher in the diabetic group. This suggests more and progressive distal arterial disease in the diabetics and not an unsuccessful inflow procedure. We conclude that aortic reconstruction can be safely carried out in diabetics with high graft patency and limb salvage rates.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:1150-1153)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, New England Deaconess Hospital and Joslin Diabetes Center, and the Harvard Medical School, Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 14, 1985.

Reprint requests to 110 Francis St, Suite 5D, Boston, MA 02215 (Dr Gibbons).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Is Diabetes a Risk Factor for Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair?
Rayan et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2002;36:33-40.
ABSTRACT  

Is Aortoprofunda Bypass a Successful Operation for Multilevel Occlusive Disease?
Kalman et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1989;23:265-271.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.