You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 11, November 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Ovarian carcinoma. The significance of restaging laparotomies with negative outcomes

R. K. Potkul, G. Delgado, E. S. Petrilli and A. Yageric

The role of restaging laparotomy in the treatment of ovarian carcinoma is currently being reevaluated. This study was initiated to examine the predictive value of a negative outcome. Between November 1974 and October 1983, sixty-three patients with no clinical evidence of disease underwent 70 restaging laparotomies for ovarian carcinoma. The findings of 34 (49%) of these procedures were negative for residual disease. Patient follow-up ranged from 30 to 137 months. Twenty-eight patients are alive with no evidence of disease with a median follow-up of 62 months. Four patients have died of a second primary tumor. Only two patients had recurrence of their ovarian carcinoma following restaging laparotomy with negative findings (recurrence rate, 5.9%; 13.3% for patients with advanced disease). Patients with negative findings at restaging laparotomy have an excellent prognosis and a good chance of being cured of their disease.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.