You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 12, December 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Improved survival in epidermoid carcinoma of the anus in association with preoperative multidisciplinary therapy

W. E. Enker, M. Heilwell, A. J. Janov, S. H. Quan, G. Magill, M. W. Stearns Jr, B. Shank, R. Leaming and S. S. Sternberg

From 1972 to 1983, we treated 78 patients who had primary epidermoid carcinoma of the anus. Forty-four of these patients were treated by protocol, while 34 patients were not treated according to protocol. Protocol consisted of fluorouracil (750 mg/m for 5 days) and mitomycin (10 to 15 mg/m on day 1), followed sequentially by 3000 rad (30 Gy) over three weeks, followed by surgery. There were 20 local excisions and 29 abdominoperineal resections in the protocol group, and 11 local excisions and 14 abdominoperineal resections in the nonprotocol group. In the protocol group, 26 patients (59%) had no residual cancer in their operative specimens, while only ten (29.9%) of the nonprotocol patients had no remaining cancer. Four (11.7%) of the 34 nonprotocol patients had pathologically positive inguinal nodes, compared with only three (4.5%) of 44 protocol patients. Thirty-four (77%) of 44 protocol patients remained free of disease, while ten patients experienced local or pelvic recurrence. In contrast, only 17 (50%) of 34 patients in the nonprotocol group remained free of disease. Of 17 recurrences, five were at distant sites. The status at this writing of all patients in the protocol group was 32 (75%), with no evidence of disease, four alive with disease, and eight dead of or with disease. Of the untreated patients, only 11 (32%) remained without evidence of disease, two were alive with disease, and 19 were dead of or with disease. Smaller carcinoma size (less than 5 cm, 27 of 32 had no evidence of disease), younger age, female gender, and deep infiltration also predicted a statistically significant survival advantage after protocol treatment. Controlled, prospective, multi-institutional trials should stratify for these factors when comparing new treatment modalities.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Carcinoma of the Anal Canal
Ryan et al.
NEJM 2000;342:792-800.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.