You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 2, February 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Scheduled reoperations (etappenlavage) for diffuse peritonitis

W. Teichmann, D. H. Wittmann and P. A. Andreone

Etappenlavage, a new concept of scheduled multiple laparotomies with abdominal lavage for diffuse peritonitis, has been in use since 1979. The purpose of etappenlavage is to ensure exclusion of the infected source, promote maximal elimination of toxic necrotic material, and allow prompt recognition of complications to effect immediate repair. Patients with diffuse peritonitis at high risk of developing multiple system organ failure (as assessed by high scores in the Peritonitis Index Altona and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation classifications) were routinely reexplored on a daily basis until evidence of improvement or healing was noted. From 1980 to 1984, 61 patients with intra-abdominal sepsis were treated. Thirty-four cases were due to spontaneous perforation of an intestinal viscus, and 27 cases were secondary to postoperative infections. In 51 cases the primary process was present for more than 48 hours. A total of 235 etappenlavages were performed (mean, 3.9 per patient). In ten cases, additional bowel lacerations were noted and repaired at the second laparotomy. In the last 31 patients, closure with a zipper has facilitated reoperation. No drains were used. After definitive closure, primary wound healing was seen in 79% of cases. The overall mortality in this high-risk group was 22.9%.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Circulating Mediators and Organ Function in Patients Undergoing Planned Relaparotomy vs Conventional Surgical Therapy in Severe Secondary Peritonitis
Zugel et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:590-599.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Stratification in Emergency Surgical Patients: Is the APACHE II Score a Reliable Marker of Physiological Impairment?
Koperna et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:55-59.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Outcome After Open Treatment of Severe Intra-abdominal Infection and Pancreatic Necrosis
Kriwanek et al.
Arch Surg 1998;133:140-144.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predicting Patient Outcome from Intensive Care: A Guide to APACHE, MPM, SAPS, PRISM, and Other Prognostic Scoring Systems
Seneff and Knaus
J Intensive Care Med 1990;5:33-52.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.