This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (115)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Wolfgang Teichmann, DH; Dietmar H. Wittmann, DH; Peter A. Andreone, MD

Arch Surg. 1986;121(2):147-152.

Abstract
• Etappenlavage, a new concept of scheduled multiple laparotomies with abdominal lavage for diffuse peritonitis, has been in use since 1979. The purpose of etappenlavage is to ensure exclusion of the infected source, promote maximal elimination of toxic necrotic material, and allow prompt recognition of complications to effect immediate repair. Patients with diffuse peritonitis at high risk of developing multiple system organ failure (as assessed by high scores in the Peritonitis Index Altona and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation classifications) were routinely reexplored on a daily basis until evidence of Improvement or healing was noted. From 1980 to 1984, 61 patients with intra-abdominal sepsis were treated. Thirty-four cases were due to spontaneous perforation of an intestinal viscus, and 27 cases were secondary to postoperative infections. In 51 cases the primary process was present for more than 48 hours. A total of 235 etappenlavages were performed (mean, 3.9 per patient). In ten cases, additional bowel lacerations were noted and repaired at the second laparotomy. In the last 31 patients, closure with a zipper has facilitated reoperation. No drains were used. After definitive closure, primary wound healing was seen in 79% of cases. The overall mortality in this high-risk group was 22.9%.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:147-152)

Author Affiliations
From the First Department of Surgery, Altona General Hospital, Hamburg, West Germany (Drs Teichmann and Wittmann); and Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis (Dr Andreone).

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Oct 22, 1985.

Read before the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Surgical Infection Society, New Orleans, April 30, 1985.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Health Sciences Center, Unit B/C Box 30,516 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (Dr Andreone).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Circulating Mediators and Organ Function in Patients Undergoing Planned Relaparotomy vs Conventional Surgical Therapy in Severe Secondary Peritonitis
Zugel et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:590-599.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Stratification in Emergency Surgical Patients: Is the APACHE II Score a Reliable Marker of Physiological Impairment?
Koperna et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:55-59.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Outcome After Open Treatment of Severe Intra-abdominal Infection and Pancreatic Necrosis
Kriwanek et al.
Arch Surg 1998;133:140-144.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does Reoperation for Abdominal Sepsis Enhance the Inflammatory Host Response?
Sautner et al.
Arch Surg 1997;132:250-255.
ABSTRACT  

Planned Relaparotomy vs Relaparotomy on Demand in the Treatment of Intra-abdominal Infections
Hau et al.
Arch Surg 1995;130:1193-1197.
ABSTRACT  

Postoperative Intra-abdominal Sepsis Requiring Reoperation: Value of a Predictive Index
Pusajo et al.
Arch Surg 1993;128:218-223.
ABSTRACT  

Predicting Patient Outcome from Intensive Care: A Guide to APACHE, MPM, SAPS, PRISM, and Other Prognostic Scoring Systems
Seneff and Knaus
J Intensive Care Med 1990;5:33-52.
ABSTRACT  

Delayed Administration of Tissue Plasminogen Activator Reduces Intra-abdominal Abscess Formation
McRitchie et al.
Arch Surg 1989;124:1406-1410.
ABSTRACT  

Treatment of Severe Intra-abdominal Sepsis and/or Necrotic Foci by an 'Open-Abdomen' Approach: Zipper and Zipper-Mesh Techniques
Garcia-Sabrido et al.
Arch Surg 1988;123:152-156.
ABSTRACT