You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 2, February 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Effects of Perioperative Fluorouracil Administration on Convalescence and Wound Healing

Joseph M. Klausner, MD; Shlomo Lelcuk, MD; Moshe Inbar, MD; Ronald Rozin, MD

Arch Surg. 1986;121(2):239-242.


Abstract

• Administration of chemotherapy is delayed by most clinicians until complete recovery from surgery because it is generally feared that cytotoxic drugs impair wound healing, reduce resistance against infection, and may hinder the recovery process. However, clinical experience is lacking. This clinical study examines the effect of perioperative administration of fluorouracil on the healing of wounds and intestinal anastomoses and the recovery process in general. Forty patients with advanced gastrointestinal tract cancers entered the study. Intravenous bolus administration of 0.5 g of fluorouracil was started during surgery. The patients underwent a variety of abdominal operations for palliation or cure. A total of 22 gastric and enteric anastomoses were performed. One half gram of fluorouracil diluted in 150 mL of 5% glucose solution was given intravenously over one hour daily for ten days postoperatively. The patients were carefully evaluated for any alteration in the postoperative recovery. Thirty-eight of the 40 patients received the full course of fluorouracil. Twenty-one patients had an uneventful postoperative course. Eighteen had mild to moderate respiratory and cardiovascular complications unrelated to fluorouracil administration. One patient died of pulmonary emboli 16 days after abdominoperineal resection. Surgical wounds healed without complications in 37 patients. One case of wound disruption occurred after sigmoidectomy. Two patients developed wound infections that healed secondarily. All 22 patients with anastomoses recovered without any evidence of leakage. Colostomies and gastrostomies functioned as anticipated. Side effects attributed to fluorouracil appeared in seven of the patients; in only two of the patients were complications life-threatening, involving bone marrow depression. All patients recovered after discontinuation of fluorouracil therapy and with supportive treatment. On the whole, the course of recovery of this group was no different than expected from patients with advanced malignant neoplasms who were undergoing extensive surgery. Based on this study, it seems that fluorouracil administration during and immediately after surgery has no deleterious effect on wound healing and recovery.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:239-242)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Hadassah (Rokach) Hospital, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 30, 1985.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Rokach-Hadassah Hospital, 8 Balfour St, PO Box 51, Tel Aviv, Israel (Dr Klausner).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.